<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AJAX&#8230;62% Good?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michaelmcderment.com/2006/02/06/ajax62-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michaelmcderment.com/2006/02/06/ajax62-good/</link>
	<description>Canadian Entrepreneur Currently Adding Value in the Web 2.0 Space</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 11:31:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim A</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelmcderment.com/2006/02/06/ajax62-good/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelmcderment.com/blog/2006/02/06/ajax62-good/#comment-68</guid>
		<description>Well put.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have a semi-rant about Ajax here - http://tim.blog.kosmo.com/blog/_archives/2006/1/18/1682146.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well put.</p>
<p>I have a semi-rant about Ajax here &#8211; <a href="http://tim.blog.kosmo.com/blog/_archives/2006/1/18/1682146.html" rel="nofollow">http://tim.blog.kosmo.com/blog/_archives/2006/1/18/1682146.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylan Pince</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelmcderment.com/2006/02/06/ajax62-good/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylan Pince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 01:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelmcderment.com/blog/2006/02/06/ajax62-good/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>&quot;I agree that Flash is usually implemented in very, very wrong ways, and I guess it is used in a bad way most of the time.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As for AJAX, I think it is great that most people are using it to enhance usability and performance. But &quot;enhance&quot; is the key word here. I don&#039;t think whole web services should be based on AJAX technology.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I agree that Flash is usually implemented in very, very wrong ways, and I guess it is used in a bad way most of the time.</p>
<p>As for AJAX, I think it is great that most people are using it to enhance usability and performance. But &quot;enhance&quot; is the key word here. I don&#039;t think whole web services should be based on AJAX technology.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dharmesh Shah</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelmcderment.com/2006/02/06/ajax62-good/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Dharmesh Shah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 17:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelmcderment.com/blog/2006/02/06/ajax62-good/#comment-66</guid>
		<description>&quot;I think AJAX, when used in moderation, is mostly good.  Basically, I see it as a vehicle for improving the user interface for many common user interactions within the context of a larger application that is mostly &quot;pure&quot; thin-client (HTML).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I get a little concerned about applications that are totally designed around AJAX.  These kinds of applications start to manifest the same types of issues we had with other &quot;rich interface in a browser&quot; type solutions.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I think AJAX, when used in moderation, is mostly good.  Basically, I see it as a vehicle for improving the user interface for many common user interactions within the context of a larger application that is mostly &quot;pure&quot; thin-client (HTML).</p>
<p>I get a little concerned about applications that are totally designed around AJAX.  These kinds of applications start to manifest the same types of issues we had with other &quot;rich interface in a browser&quot; type solutions.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron Booth</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelmcderment.com/2006/02/06/ajax62-good/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron Booth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 14:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelmcderment.com/blog/2006/02/06/ajax62-good/#comment-65</guid>
		<description>&quot;I think it&#039;s important to note a few things:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;- technologies themselves aren&#039;t &quot;bad&quot;, it&#039;s the people who implement them that aren&#039;t doing the appropriate homework&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;- Not all web projects are intended to be &quot;highly usable&quot;. Though I personally feel that usability is very important, I think it&#039;s OK for other people to opt not to care about usability, for other reasons.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That said, yes, I&#039;d say Ajax is, maybe 70% good....and flash, well, 70% bad..wouldn&#039;t go so far as 99% because there are flash implementations out there that are well done.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I think it&#039;s important to note a few things:</p>
<p>- technologies themselves aren&#039;t &quot;bad&quot;, it&#039;s the people who implement them that aren&#039;t doing the appropriate homework</p>
<p>- Not all web projects are intended to be &quot;highly usable&quot;. Though I personally feel that usability is very important, I think it&#039;s OK for other people to opt not to care about usability, for other reasons.</p>
<p>That said, yes, I&#039;d say Ajax is, maybe 70% good&#8230;.and flash, well, 70% bad..wouldn&#039;t go so far as 99% because there are flash implementations out there that are well done.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

